The hidden agenda of the LGBT movement
Contrary to what its advocates say, there is more to the LGBT movement than their claim that “what two consenting adults do with their bodies is nobody’s business.” It’s a deceptively compelling yet misleading phrase that hides a more insidious agenda than adult bodies and consent.
In fact, there is one strand of the movement that does not believe that parents should know, much less be allowed to give their consent, after complete strangers from the movement have brainwashed their children at school and convinced them to change their sex through surgery – from boy to girl, or girl to boy.
These perverts who prey on innocent children on the blind side of their parents are known as “groomers,” and their actions have been deemed offensive enough in the LGBT movement for the creation of a group known as, “Gays Against Groomers”.
But, as they do with anyone who dares disagree with them, they have dismissed the anti-groomers as “right wing”, whatever that means, without dealing with the substance of their concerns: The subversion of parental rights in the name of sexual perversion. (Is this what we want in Ghana, where the LGBT movement is already grooming children by burying LGBT images and messages in the middle of children’s cartoon books and video games?)
But if their problem is with “right wing” criticism of their excesses, what would they say to the various articles by the left-leaning New York Times, long an ally of the LGBT movement, that portray them as arrogant, reckless, devious, deviant, self-seeking, and corrupt, to the point of losing support among Americans, with the following article on January 19, 2026, “Americans Are Turning Against Gay People”.
The Times’ articles go as far back as December 2015, with a critical piece under the heading, “U.S. Support for Gay Rights in Africa May Have Done More Harm Than Good”, a sentiment that has been repeated many times as the LGBT foray into Africa has taken on the aura of a holy war, with some prominent Ghanaians often “induced” to make favourable public statements to weaken public resistance. (A pastor is said to have rejected financial inducement to join the parade of prominent people making such statements).
In their typical racist-fascist-globalist manner, the LGBT movement, with the support of a few “negroes” (in Ghana and abroad) have responded to the African resistance by claiming that it is fuelled by “conservative U.S. evangelical and right-wing organisations”. In other words, Africans are incapable of knowing what is good or bad for them but for the benevolence of outsiders, from both left and right.
Other articles (“How the Gay Rights Movement Radicalized and Lost Its Way; A Pattern of Lavish Spending at a Leading L.G.B.T. Nonprofit; and Americans Are Turning Against Gay People”) paint a picture of a rogue movement that would stop are nothing at perpetuating itself to make it relevant, long after it had won its initial battles at home, even it means subverting the sovereignty of entire nations and assaulting the values of a continent.
And then there is the agenda to re-engineer even the language we speak to suit the whims of the dystopian world that they wish to create. There are the trans people, who undergo surgery to become “women”, and even argue that “transwomen are women”. The same people then claim that the word “women” is offensive and should be replaced with ridiculous terms like “people who bleed” or “people who menstruate”. (The “UN Women” Agency has remained loudly silent on this blatant assault on womanhood). They consider a harmless word like “breastfeeding” as also offensive and propose instead “chest-feeding”. The list of lingo fascism is endless.
There is the agenda to invade women’s spaces (by men in lipstick and high heels claiming to be women) and in the process taking over opportunities meant for women and even girls. This is why there is a plus sign at the end of their name: To signal that there is more subversion in store for sane society. It’s a classic case of, “give them an inch and they will take a mile.”
As the debate over LGBT in Ghana rages on – and seeks to distract us from more important issues of our development – it is important to bear in mind that LGBT is about more than what “two consenting adults do with their bodies”. It’s about a takeover of the world by a racist-globalist movement, with the assistance of their local “activist” agents, who believe, as their ancestors did in classical imperialism, that their values are superior and most be imposed on the rest of the world. LGBT is cultural imperialism.
We have a moral duty to resist them – just as Kwame Nkrumah and his comrades resisted classical imperialism and brought us independence and sovereignty. We must protect both at all cost.
