The Lithium agreement: Is Ghana getting a fair deal?

Ghana's recent mining lease for the exploitation of lithium has sparked intense debate and discussions among various stakeholders. 

While some, like Fui Tsikata and Kofi Ansah, argue that the deal is beneficial for the country, Prof Ransford Gyampo has raised compelling concerns about the motives behind it and the potential negative impact on Ghana's resources and economy. As a Ghanaian, I fully support Prof Gyampo's observations and believe that Ghana must adopt more transparent and equitable procedures when negotiating resource deals.

Inaccurate calculation of benefits

One of the key issues raised by Prof Gyampo is the inaccuracy in the calculation of what Ghana is likely to gain from the deal. Tsikata and Ansah's analysis fails to consider that foreign companies will also be mining valuable by-products such as aluminium and silica. Ignoring these elements in their calculations implies that Ghana stands to earn far less than what is being promised.

Questionable tax and financial arrangements

Prof Gyampo rightly highlights the corporate tax and financial arrangements offered to the foreign company. The 10-year tax holiday granted under the Free Zones program, coupled with special concessions on electricity costs, significantly diminishes Ghana's potential income from the venture. It is unreasonable to expect more revenue when the foreign company is given a decade of tax exemption and pays only a fraction of the electricity costs associated with the operation.

Preference for service contracts and joint ventures

Prof Gyampo brings up an important point about the advantages of service contracts, joint ventures, and colonial concessionary arrangements. It is an established debate that countries serious about extricating themselves from poverty and underdevelopment would opt for service contracts or joint venture agreements. These arrangements ensure a fair distribution of benefits and prevent lopsided resource exploitation.

Historical lessons and Ghana's Future

As a Ghanaian, I am concerned about the historical trend of giving away natural resources without fully realizing their benefits. We must break free from this cycle and adopt a more cautious approach. Prof Gyampo's call for transparency, stakeholder involvement, and equitable distribution of benefits is crucial for Ghana's long-term economic growth and sustainable development.

In conclusion, Prof Ransford Gyampo's critique of Fui Tsikata and Kofi Ansah's paper sheds light on the real challenges and potential pitfalls associated with Ghana's mining lease for lithium. Ghana must learn from past mistakes and ensure that all stakeholders are involved in the negotiation process. Transparency, equity, and thoughtful consideration of the long-term ramifications of resource deals are essential for the prosperity of the Ghanaian people. It is time for Ghana to prioritize its interests and put in place measures that will contribute to poverty alleviation and overall development.

As a concerned Ghanaian, I am in full agreement with Prof Gyampo's assertions and call for a more transparent and equitable approach to resource deals. We cannot afford to repeat history and sacrifice our future for quick gains. Let us stand together and demand fair and sustainable practices that will benefit present and future generations alike. Together we can.