This is Sue Gray, UK Prime Minister's Chief of Staff who receives more salary than her boss
This is Keir Starmer's top aide Sue Gray, who is paid more than the United Kingdom's Prime Minister for her work as a Chief of Staff.
Advertisement
Sir Keir Starmer’s chief of staff received a pay rise after the election which means she is now paid more than the prime minister.
The BBC has been told that Sue Gray asked for and was given a salary of £170,000 - £3,000 more than the PM and more than any cabinet minister – or her Conservative predecessor.
One source told the BBC: "It was suggested that she might want to go for a few thousand pounds less than the prime minister to avoid this very story. She declined."
A government source close to Ms Gray said this claim was "categorically untrue" and she had "had no involvement in any decision on her pay".
The decision has ignited a row within government over Ms Gray, whose report while a senior civil servant into parties in Downing Street during the pandemic contributed to the downfall of Boris Johnson.
She then went on to work as a Labour Party adviser.
Her wide-ranging role as the prime minister's chief of staff includes controlling access to the PM and helping to ensure the government's policies are put into action.
Other Trending Stories
Her Conservative predecessor Liam, now Lord, Booth Smith, who did the job under Rishi Sunak, was paid at the upper end of the highest pay band for special advisers, between £140,000 and £145,000 a year.
The boost in Ms Gray’s pay comes after the prime minister signed off a rebanding of the salaries for special advisers shortly after taking office.
The government says the rebanding was done by officials, not by Ms Gray herself, and her salary is not at the top of the new highest band for special advisers.
News of Ms Gray’s pay rise, briefed to the BBC by a number of Whitehall sources, is the latest in a line of leaks about her which paint a picture of fractious relationships at the very top of government, just months into Labour’s tenure.
"It speaks to the dysfunctional way No10 is being run - no political judgement, an increasingly grand Sue who considers herself to be the deputy prime minister, hence the salary and no other voice for the prime minister to hear as everything gets run through Sue," one insider told the BBC.
The prime minister earns £166,786.
One angry government insider branded Ms Gray's pay "the highest ever special adviser salary in the history of special advisers".
Others in government speak passionately in Ms Gray’s defence and believe there is a misplaced and deeply personal campaign against her which is grossly unfair.
A government source said "any questions should be directed at the process and not an individual".
Asked about Ms Gray being paid more than the PM, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: "We’re very lucky to have Sue."
Another cabinet minister, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the BBC: "Sue has done an enormous job preparing Labour for government, and is now showing her customary drive to get Whitehall to deliver on Labour’s priorities.
"She won’t be distracted, she will carry on doing what she always does, focus on delivering the change that the British people voted for."
Ms Gray’s salary has sparked such a row in government partly because other advisers believe they are being underpaid.
Advertisement
Every cabinet minister has at least two special advisers, many of whom also worked with them in opposition.
Then, they were paid by the Labour Party.
Most were expecting pay rises upon entering government only to discover they would in fact be paid less.
Many of the disappointed advisers blame Ms Gray specifically - although others insist that pay is a matter for civil servants.
The majority of those on the committee within Whitehall responsible for special advisers pay and conditions are civil servants, but Ms Gray is on it too.
Advertisement
"It’s bizarre," one furious adviser told the BBC. "I’m working harder than ever in a more important job and they want to pay me less than the Labour Party was paying me when it was broke."
These frustrations are not confined to junior advisers.
A source claimed that the prime minister’s director of communications, Matthew Doyle, was initially offered a salary of £110,000, significantly less than Ms Gray’s.
This was later raised to £140,000, a figure in line with several of his predecessors doing the same job.
Advertisement
There is no suggestion there was any anger internally over Doyle’s pay.
Many special advisers worked for weeks without being shown a proposed employment contract, meaning that by the time they discovered what their salary would be they had essentially no choice but to accept it.
Again, Ms Gray was widely blamed for the delay in formal contracts being circulated.
When Ms Gray was hired as Starmer’s chief of staff in 2023 she was tasked with working on Labour’s preparations for government.
Special advisers see the row over their salaries as a sign that the work was not carried out in enough detail.
"If you ever see any evidence of our preparations for government, please let me know," one adviser said.
When a new government is elected dozens of new special advisers arrive all at once.
To ensure people are paid immediately, they were each put on a holding salary, while the new pay bands were worked through.
Others questioned why the initial batch of ministerial appointments, which Ms Gray oversaw, took so long given the chief of staff had had months to plan.
A minister for the Middle East, Hamish Falconer, was not appointed until 18 July, two weeks after the general election.
Successive Conservative governments also explored increasing the pay of special advisers, before concluding "the politics is wild", as one Tory source put it, of giving advisers pay rises when millions of households were struggling with the cost of living.
Under both Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, proposals for increases were fully worked up, we are told, "but they were rejected because they were seen as indefensible".
Those in government now argue the pay of special advisers had become well out of step with others in Whitehall and needed to go up.
But others still think Ms Gray’s pay is excessive.
A Cabinet Office spokesman told the BBC: "It is false to suggest that political appointees have made any decisions on their own pay bands or determining their own pay.
"Any decision on special adviser pay is made by officials not political appointees. As set out publicly, special advisers cannot authorise expenditure of public funds or have responsibility for budgets."
The Conservatives said Labour had 10 questions to answer, including whether the prime minister personally signed off Ms Gray's new salary and the increase to the cap on the highest pay band.
They have also asked whether a special adviser remuneration committee still exists and if Ms Gray is a member, as well as what role she played in setting her own salary and changing pay bands.
Chris Mason, BBC's Political editor on why finding out about Sue Gray’s salary really matters
I want to explain how we brought you the story about the salary of the prime minister’s chief of staff, why we did, and why it matters.
On Sunday, I was approached with confidential information by a government insider.
That information was Sue Gray’s new salary, £170,000 a year, and a deep sense of anger about her pay, her influence and a perception others in government were badly treated and underpaid.
As a salary, £170,000 is many times higher than the national average, but considerably less than plenty of people, some in the public sector and many in the private sector, would earn in a position of equivalent seniority.
Like many people in the public sector, her salary will in time be published anyway.
And full disclosure - mine is too.
But this story, at its crux, is not about her salary per se.
It is about the levels of upset and anger - fair or otherwise - about her and her role at the top of government.
That is what motivated the person who tipped me off - at considerable professional risk - to tell me what I am now telling you.
And I know from other conversations I have had - and members of our BBC team have had - that this person is far from alone.
And that tells you something about the fractious relationships among some at the top of government, less than three months after Labour won the election.
And that matters.
I was first tipped off at the weekend and I had not gone looking for this information, it found me.
My source chose to tell the BBC, knowing that if we could corroborate and verify the information - and a wider sense of anger - the range of our programmes on television and radio and news articles here online would take the news to a wide audience.
Our team, led by me, chief political correspondent Henry Zeffman and others, sought to verify and corroborate what I had been told.
As journalists, we have to be sceptical about where information is coming from, its accuracy and why we are being told it - and seek to explain to you what we know and do not know, and the motivations of those telling us stuff.
And we should always calibrate the breadth and depth of - in this instance - anger and frustration and put it in context.
Over a few days, we established from other, independent sources that what I had been told was accurate.
Crucially, it was also very much apparent our source was far from alone in their sense of grievance about Ms Gray.
When I spoke to several senior figures in government with the information we had pulled together, they did not dispute the central tenets of our story.
We were also able to bring you the wider context of salaries among government staff and how this government’s approach to it is different from the governments that went before.
There are plenty in government now who are angry and upset that we have reported this and feel it is deeply unfair to Ms Gray.
She is, after all, a figure without her own public platform, she can not come out and talk to me in front of a camera, as a politician might.
Her allies feel there is a nasty and vindictive campaign from some to discredit her - and others worry deeply stories like this could put people off considering a job in government out of fear their name could be kicked around in public.
But the central truth here is there is a row at the top of a very new government - and it is important I tell you about that.
It is my job to try to bring you as clear a sense as I can of what is really going on at the heart of government, warts and all.
And that is what I - and our wider team - have tried to do here.
Chris Mason, Political editor
credit: BBC