“It depends on what is in it” – Mahama’s remarks on Family Values Bill stirs debate  

Former President John Dramani Mahama’s comments on Ghana’s “Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024” have ignited widespread debate as the nation prepares to head to the polls this weekend.  

In an interview with the BBC on Wednesday, December 4, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) presidential candidate said his decision to assent to the bill, should he win the presidency, would “depend on what is in the bill”. 

Mr Mahama described the legislation, passed by Parliament in February, as a “Family Values Bill” and not an anti-LGBTQ+ bill, noting its unanimous approval by Parliament. He added, “The President should share any concerns about the bill and either refer it back to Parliament for further review or seek advice from the Council of State.”  

The bill has drawn significant attention for its proposed measures, including penalties for LGBTQ+ identification, advocacy or support, as well as restrictions on organisations working on inclusivity and non-discrimination.  

Mixed Public reactions  

Mahama’s measured response has sparked mixed reactions across Ghana. Some critics accuse him of avoiding a direct stance, while others praise his balanced approach as politically prudent.  

On X (formerly Twitter), user @staywicked_FCB questioned Mahama’s awareness of the bill: “Is he trying to say he’s not aware of what’s in the bill championed by his own party member? What a skillful conman.”  

However, Mahama’s remarks also garnered support from those who viewed his response as strategic. X user @dr_officiale defended him, stating: “He has been put on the spot, damned if he said yes, damned if he said no. In an election season, if you don’t understand that the answer he gave is to be expected and is the most politically correct, then you’re ignorant.”  

Osei Dagadu echoed this sentiment: “What an accurate and balanced answer by all standards. Thank you, JM!”  

Facebook user Anthony Dormekpor Jnr criticised the timing of such questions during an election season, writing: “You people are not serious? During this crucial moment of election, you are asking presidential candidates whether he will sign a bill or not.”  

Legal challenges

The bill currently faces two lawsuits before the Supreme Court, challenging its constitutionality. Legal practitioner Richard Dela Sky argues that the bill violates several provisions of the 1992 Constitution, including articles related to human rights and equality. Dr Amanda Odoi has also sought a restraining order to prevent the bill from being forwarded to President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo for assent.  

As Ghanaians prepare to vote, Mahama’s stance on the Family Values Bill has become a focal point of public discourse, reflecting broader societal tensions over LGBTQ+ rights and governance. With the election only a day away, his comments continue to shape the debate on Ghana’s approach to balancing cultural values with constitutional rights.  

Read some of the social media posts below;